Django Unchained (2012)

Mitchell
(Originally posted here.)

Django Unchained
Jamie Foxx, Christoph Waltz, Leonardo DiCaprio, Don Johnson. Directed by Quentin Tarantino.

django

When Quentin Tarantino is at his best, he has enormous fun making movies. Every plot element, line of dialogue, visual effect, splatter of blood, soundtrack tune, camera angle, jump cut, and title screen primarily serves the purpose of being fun, and when a mind as creative and untethered as Tarantino’s is set first on having fun, how does a lover of film also not have fun watching him do his thing?

I was worried that Tarantino was going to continue down a path he started with Inglourious Basterds, a decorated film that, for all its final-act silliness, manages still to take itself too seriously and forget how to have fun. There are a few moments in Django Unchained that teeter in that direction, when Tarantino seems to be trying to remind us, unnecessarily, of the evils of slavery, but he quickly jerks us back with an unexpected modern pop song in the soundtrack, or an enormous, side-scrolling title that stretches the entire height of the screen. Such hyper-stylistic decisions can be a distraction if one is intent on staying within the film, but this is the wrong approach: to enjoy a Tarantino movie, one must stay within the film-making, not the film itself. Self-awareness is the rule, not the violation.

django2

In his best movie since Jackie Brown, Tarantino gives us Jamie Foxx as Django, a slave set free by Dr. King Schultz (Christoph Waltz), a bounty hunter who requires Django’s assistance. The duo brings in several bounties on its way to freeing Django’s wife, a slave owned by Leonardo DiCaprio as Calvin J. Candie. Schultz walks through deadly situations with the calm assurance of someone who knows more than anyone else on the screen, like a video-game player who’s already played this level fifty times and is in a hurry to get to the hard part. I have not liked Waltz in anything he’s been in, but I like him very much in Django. Perhaps he is better suited to being the good guy than the bad. Foxx is an excellent combination of Sweet Sweetback and Clint Eastwood’s Man with No Name, charismatic and cool.

django3In his earlier films, Tarantino was more inclined to show the action leading up to the violent act and then that act’s messy results. Despite what you remember about the grisly Michael Madsen “Stuck in the Middle with You” scene in Reservoir Dogs, we are never actually shown the violent act. That framework is largely abandoned in this new movie, where we are treated to a couple of disturbing scenes. For all his focus on having fun, there is definitely a serious theme here about slavery-related issues we might not have been familiar with. And because he has often been criticized for the blood and violence in his movies, I suspect there’s an even larger exploration here on the topic of violence in film.

However, to lose oneself in topics and themes is to miss Django Unchained‘s best gift. It is three hours of joyous film-making, a return to form for a director who makes me laugh not merely by being witty or clever, but by reminding me of how much fun movies can be.

9/10
90/100

Reid
(Originally posted here.)

Django Unchained (2012)
Dir. Quentin Tarantino
56/100

I know Mitchell really liked this, and that surprises me. Honestly, I have a hard time imagining other people loving this film, so I can’t really say who will like this. If I had to take a wild guess, I would say Joel would think this is just OK. I guess I’d everyone else would react that way, too, but I’m uncertain.

**
Dr. King Schultz (Christof Walz), German bounty hunter, frees a slave, Django, because the latter can identify the men Schultz is pursuing. In the process, they become partners and Schultz agrees to help free Django’s wife. The problem is that she is a slave to one of the biggest slave owners in the South, Calvin Candie (Leonardo DiCaprio).

This is basically Tarantino’s take on a Spaghetti Western. The film isn’t fragmented like other Tarantino films, which is a good thing, but there aren’t very many of the memorable dialogue, characters or scenes in the film–at least in my opinion. The story and plot are standard exploitation action film (with some Tarantino touches, like the use of pop music; references to older films, etc.), and the movie feels like an A movie posing as a B movie. If you like those films, then this might be for you. The movie was flat to me and problematic. I’ll go into the latter in the next section.

***
The scenes became problematic as soon as the protagonists enter into Candie’s world. I’m especially thinking of several scenes like the dog attack and castration scene. These were not only disturbing, but I felt they were inappropriate and in bad taste. It would be like making a revenge fantasy set in a Nazi concentration camp and showing villains using gas chambers and ovens. I can’t think of a justification for these scenes. Is it a serious condemnation on these practices? They seem to function as the reprehensible behavior of villains that will make the vengeful and violent climax justified and “enjoyable.” if that’s the case, then I think he could have chose some other way to achieve this. I felt the decision crossed the line into bad taste. Or am I failing to understand the film? That could very well be, so I’m interested in hearing an alternative explanation of those scenes.

  1. No Comments

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.